Skip to content
Urban Blackjack 168

Trump's Regime of Punishment and Favor

The ex-president's insatiable desire for retribution has swiftly evolved into a organized apparatus. Within the twelve months, the president's fury and impulses have taken on the shape of government actions in a manner reminiscent to historical dictatorial governments. Federal officials who do not cooperate are summarily fired and substituted by loyalists. Critical figures who challenge him encounter prosecution, court proceedings and sanctions. Opponents have been categorized under administration directives as “anti-American”, “anti-Christian” and “anti-capitalist”, and warned with legal action as “security threats”.

Government Institutions Transformed

All situation involving prosecution of political opponents and leniency for his allies demonstrates its own unique characteristics. Yet, regardless of their particular nature, they exemplify expressions of what has developed as a calculated approach. These incidents are not isolated. His cleansing of Department of Justice prosecutors and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents, alongside his placement of loyalists in senior positions, started swiftly, soon took on a pattern, and has now been shaped into a regime. DoJ and the Federal Bureau have been restructured into partisan bodies under the president's clear orders to implement his demands. Wrongdoing has been turned into normal. This is the retribution system.

Administration is preoccupied with targeting the President's supposed opponents than they are with safeguarding our national security.

Inside the Apparatus

The foundation of this system has been exposed in the court filing of three ex- senior law enforcement officials filed in September in the federal court in DC against FBI director Kash Patel and justice department head Pam Bondi for illegal termination in “a campaign of retribution against Plaintiffs for what administration figures judged to be a refusal to show sufficient political loyalty”. In the complaint that Brian Driscoll, the former acting FBI director, recounts a discussion in which Patel “publicly confessed the unlawfulness of his conduct”.

The official had attempted to protect law enforcement officers from being fired, the complaint claims. The director told him that “administration officials” – understood by the official to be the White House and justice department – had directed him to dismiss everyone who they determined as having participated in a criminal investigation against him. The complaint continues: “Patel clarified that he had to terminate the personnel his leaders told him to dismiss, because his chance to retain his own position depended on the removal of the personnel who were involved in investigations involving the chief executive. The director commented that there was no option he or him could do to stop these or any other dismissals, because ‘the FBI sought to place the President in prison and he hasn't forgotten it.’” Once he advised the director he was violating the FBI's own regulations, the director allegedly said “he understood that and he realized the nature of the immediate dismissals were likely unlawful”.

Widespread Impact

Since Patel's alleged acknowledgment to the official, the Department of Justice and the FBI have been dismantled and repurposed for the administration's retribution system. Six of the bureau's high-ranking agents were fired or pushed out in the first days of the government. Roughly 4,500 legal professionals at the department have agreed to a “voluntary departure plan”. A minimum of seven DoJ lawyers, among them those in the New York office, stepped down in dissent over what they considered as ideological pressure in abandoning the criminal prosecution against the New York City mayor, a political figure, in as a trade for his assistance with the administration's federal agency arrests of migrants. The public integrity section of DoJ, which oversees misconduct investigations, has been reduced to a handful of lawyers. The equality section has been devastated: 70% of its staff has departed. 33% of senior leaders at DoJ have left. The section implementing environmental law has seen departures of half its leadership.

Rewards and Punishments

Regarding the Adams case, the acting US attorney for the federal division, Danielle Sassoon, resigned in dissent against what she characterized as the “exchange”. The border official, Trump's “enforcement chief,” appeared as the implementer with the mayor on Fox News to state: “Unless he complies, I'll reappear in New York City.”. Meanwhile, another figure, previously the justice department figure and a former Trump attorney, who negotiated the agreement, was granted an appellate federal judgeship, a potential springboard to the judicial branch.

Trump's exemption for offenses committed while in power, awarded by the unprecedented ruling of the GOP-led on the judicial body, thus blocking his legal action over the Capitol riot and maintaining his electoral prospects for the presidential race, is the foundation stone on which he relies to shield his supporters. Under these circumstances, he has been freed to permit corruption. The consequence of the court judgment saturates his administration and the political party completely. The court matter has escalated. As Richard Nixon's legal adviser the figure said about the Watergate

By

Laurie Adams

A seasoned casino strategist with over a decade of experience in online gaming and blackjack tournaments.

Urban Blackjack 168

Type to search articles.